|
1. |
Background to Amendment |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
The bill for the Law for Partial Amendments to the Banking Law,
etc. (2005 Law No.106, hereinafter referred to as ''Amended Law'') was submitted
at the 163rd extraordinary Diet session by the Cabinet on October 4, 2005. It
was passed and enacted in its original form in the House of Representatives and
the House of Councillors on October 20 and October 26, respectively, and
promulgated on November 2. The latest amendment involves taking the following measures aimed at improving convenience for depositors, etc. and the efficiency of bank management: (a) review the bank agent system (establishment of bank agency business system, etc.); (b) deregulate subsidiaries, operations, etc. of banks, etc.; and (c) ensure proper business operations of banks, etc. |
|||||||||||||||
2. |
Establishment of Bank Agency Business System |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
(1) Background The bank agent system has been subject to a series of regulatory reforms to the present date, including replacing the licensing system for establishing/abolishing bank agents with a notification system, expanding the scope of agents' operations, establishing and expanding the system of financial institutions' agents. However, under the current regulations, (a) corporate agents are limited to wholly-owned subsidiaries, etc., and (b) agents are prohibited from engaging in non-agency operations on the side. Therefore, even though agents are potentially effective sales channels, they have not been fully utilized due to their lack of mobility and flexibility and the difficulties involved in meeting diverse customer needs. The financial sector has long been submitting requests for the abolition and relaxation of capital requirements and for the further expansion of the scope of agents' operations. Further, the Financial System Council reported in the ''Medium-term Vision for the Future of the Japanese Financial System'' on September 30, 2002 that ''a wide range of financial products may be provided by a financial intermediary, not necessarily directly, but at least indirectly via an agency or in some other form.'' In the recent reform of the financial system, channels for providing financial products and services have been diversified and enhanced in line with such a vision, including establishing securities brokerage services (enforced on April 1, 2004), lifting the ban on banks, etc. (enforced on December 1, 2004), establishing trust banking agents, etc. (enforced on December 30, 2004). As part of the reform, the ''Three-Year Program for Promoting Regulatory Reform and Privatization'' approved by the Cabinet on March 19, 2004 sets forth that ''the bank agent system will be reviewed including the capital requirements, in consideration of the impact on the soundness of financial institutions and settlement systems, and a study will be conducted and measures will be taken during FY2004.'' With this in mind, the Second Subcommittee of the Sectional Committee on the Financial System of the Financial System Council held discussions about reviewing the bank agent system three times between December 2004 and February 2005, and compiled the ''Summary of Agendas for Reviewing the Bank Agent System'' on February 2, 2005, which set forth the basic approach to reviewing the bank agent system: ''capital requirements, specialization regulations, etc. can be abolished… by improving the system for protecting depositors, maintaining a smooth and reliable settlement system and ensuring the financial system's soundness.'' The latest amendment is based on the Second Subcommittee's reports and discussions. (2) Approach to Reviewing Bank Agent System The basic approach of the latest amendment is to secure and improve users' access to financial services and allow entities to enter into the bank agency business in more diverse ways so that financial institutions can efficiently utilize various sales channels. Accordingly, ordinary businesses no longer have to have a capital relationship with a bank, which was previously a requirement for entering the bank agency business. Further, agents are now able to engage in non-bank agency operations on the side. On the other hand, entry into the bank agency business is now subject to approval aimed at ensuring that bank agency businesses are executed in a proper and steady fashion, while agents who wish to engage in non-bank agency operations on the side are subject to authorization on an individual basis. Further, measures are to be taken to ensure user protection and the soundness of banks. |
|||||||||||||||
3. |
Overview of Bank Agency Business System |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
(1) Definition of Bank Agency Business ''Bank agency business'' is defined as a business involving serving either as an agency or an intermediary on behalf of a bank for the bank's core businesses, namely: (a) accepting deposits or installment savings, etc.; (b) lending funds or discounting bills; and (c) concluding foreign-exchange contracts (paragraph 14, Article 2 of the amended Banking Law, hereinafter the same with respect to all quoted clauses unless stated otherwise) and is subject to the bank agency business system (Therefore, for example, if a bank serves as an intermediary for a securities service, it will be regulated by the Securities and Exchange Law as a securities brokerage service.) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
4. |
Deregulation of Subsidiaries, Operations, etc. |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
(1) Lifting of Ban on Joint Establishment of Auxiliary Service Company Under the existing Banking Law, if a bank wishes to have a company operating auxiliary services (business-purpose real estate management service, welfare service, ATM maintenance and inspection service, cash collection service, etc.) as its subsidiary, the bank's dependency on income (ratio of income to total income) from the bank group (the bank, the bank's holding company and their subsidiaries) must exceed 50%, in view of the objective of prohibiting banks from engaging in other businesses, etc. Furthermore, unless the company meets the income dependency requirement, the bank and its subsidiaries together cannot hold more than 5% voting power of the company (or more than 15% in the case of the bank's holding company and its subsidiaries combined) (paragraph 3, Article 16 of the Banking Law). This makes it impossible for bank groups to jointly establish an auxiliary service company. The latest amendment allows bank groups, etc., to jointly establish an auxiliary service company provided that the income dependency of the bank group and other bank groups, etc., combined exceeds a certain percentage with respect to the auxiliary service company, in order to help improve the efficiency of bank management, etc. |
|||||||||||||||
(2) Abolition of Licensing System for Securities Operations, etc., under Shinkin Bank Law, etc. In order for a shinkin bank to engage in securities operations, trust operations or trust operations relating to secured bonds, the shinkin bank had to be registered, etc., under the Securities and Exchange Law, the Law for Trust Business in Financial Institutions and the Law on Secured Bonds Trust, and separately, be licensed under the provisions of the Shinkin Bank Law. The licensing system under the Shinkin Bank Law is now abolished. The licensing system for accepting solicitation or management of local government bonds, etc., on trust under the Shinkin Bank Law has also been scrapped (Articles 53 and 54 of the Shinkin Bank Law). Similar amendments have been made for labor credit associations (Article 58 and paragraph 2, Article 58 of the Labor Credit Association Law), credit unions (Article 3 of the Cooperative Banking Law), agricultural cooperatives (Article 10 of the Agricultural Cooperative Association Law), fisheries cooperatives (Articles 11, 87, 93 and 97 of the Fishery Cooperative Law) and the Norinchukin Bank (Article 54 of the Norinchukin Bank Law). |
|||||||||||||||
5. |
Measures to Ensure Proper Business Operations |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
(1) Review of Arms Length Rule As a measure to prevent terms of trade that are available solely to relatives from undermining the interests of depositors, etc., as a consequence, the bank is not allowed to have dealings, etc., with specific parties or customers of specific parties that would be detrimental to the bank in light of the bank's normal terms of trade (so-called arms-length rule). In conjunction with the establishment of the bank agency business system, bank agents have been included in the definition of specific parties, in order to prevent any harmful effects from arising due to bank agents exercising undue influence on the affiliate bank (paragraph 2, Article 13 of the Banking Law). (2) Prohibited Activities in Operations of Banks, etc. The Banking Law squarely defines bank agents and explicitly states the prohibited activities relating to bank agency business in concrete terms (paragraph 45, Article 52 of the Banking Law). By the same token, the Banking Law explicitly states typical prohibited activities of the banks themselves, in consideration of our experience, etc., in supervisory administration (paragraph 3, Article 13 of the Banking Law). Specifically, activities with the risk of undermining customer protection have been banned, such as: (a) making a false statement to a customer; (b) making an assertion on matters that are uncertain or making a statement that might be misconstrued as a certainty; and (c) providing credit or promising to provide credit on the condition that the customer performs transactions associated with operations run by a closely-related entity by abusing the bank's dominant position. (3) Reporting Request and On-the-spot Inspection targeted at Contractors of Banks, etc. Banks are outsourcing their operations in view of improving the efficiency of bank operations and for other reasons. However, problems have occurred in recent years in the form of system problems, leaked client information, etc. There is a risk that reporting requests and on-the-spot inspections targeted at banks might not be sufficient by themselves for the purpose of ensuring sound and proper business operations of banks. Accordingly, in order to improve the effectiveness of inspection and supervision of banks, etc. (referring to a bank or the bank's holding company), the FSA is now allowed to directly issue a reporting request and conduct on-the-spot inspection with respect to (a) a corporation whose management is controlled by banks, etc., and (b) an entity that has been commissioned to undertake operations for banks, etc. (excluding bank agents), in addition to the subsidiaries of banks, etc., to the extent required if it is deemed particularly necessary in order to ensure sound and proper business operations at the bank (related to Articles 24 and 25, and paragraphs 31 and 32 of Article 52 of the Banking Law). ''An entity that has been commissioned to undertake operations for banks, etc.,'' is deemed to correspond to a contractor of the bank's ancillary operations, a contractor taking on necessary duties to run operations (system administration, etc.) and the like. (Note) Similar measures have been taken for long-term credit banks, shinkin banks, labor credit associations, credit unions, agricultural cooperatives, fisheries cooperatives and the Norinchukin Bank with respect to 1 through 3 above. (4) Public Announcement of Interim Financial Results of Banks, etc., and Compulsory Disclosure The new capital adequacy requirements (Basel II) attach greater importance to disclosure than ever before, for the purpose of improving the effectiveness of market discipline through the enhancement of disclosure, in that they require the disclosure of the capital adequacy ratio, its breakdown, the extent of risk by risk type, the risk calculation method and so on. With this trend in mind, the bank and the bank's holding company are now obliged to make their financial results and disclosure journals available for public inspection with respect to the first half of the fiscal year (April to September) on top of the annual financial results and disclosure journals which were already compulsory, in order to further enhance disclosure (Articles 20 and 21, and paragraphs 28 and 29 of Article 52 of the Banking Law). |
|||||||||||||||
6. |
Enforcement Date, etc. |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
(1) Enforcement Date The Amended Law will be enforced from the day set forth by government ordinance within one year of its promulgation (November 2, 2005) (hereinafter referred to as ''enforcement date'') (The Amended Law is scheduled to come into force on April 1, 2006) (Article 1 of Supplementary Provisions). |
|||||||||||||||
|
* | This section provides easy-to-understand explanations on financial terms
and various questions related to financial matters that tend to be too
specialized and hard to understand. The keyword for this month is ''Accountant's audit quality control''. |
Audit corporations and Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) are required to audit the financial statements, etc. of companies according to generally-accepted auditing standards (GAAS) and express their opinion on those financial statements, etc. based on the audit results. One form of GAAS is the Auditing Standards released to the public by the Business Accounting Council (BAC), which include standards that should be observed for the quality control of audits. The BAC decided at the general meeting held in January 2005 to launch deliberations on making quality control of audits more concrete, stricter, etc., in response to the scandals relating to the quality control of audits based on the screening system, internal control system, etc. of audit corporations. On October 28, the BAC revised the Auditing Standards and established the ''Standards for Quality Control of Audit independently of the Auditing Standards,'' in order to rationally ensure the quality of audit duties performed by CPAs. The revised Auditing Standards define quality control as ''control of quality required to properly conduct all audits in compliance with GAAS.'' They also state that ''auditors must establish quality control policies and procedures for their own organization and confirm that audits are being conducted in accordance with them.'' The Standards for Quality Control of Audit consists of provisions for standards applicable to audit firms, which are laid down separately from the provisions for standards applicable to audit staff with respect to each item, as quality control to be observed by audit firms is distinguished from quality control to be observed by audit staff who performs the individual audit duties. Main items of the Standards for Quality Control of Audit are: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Practical guidelines required for applying the Auditing Standards in practice have been prepared by the Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (JICPA). For quality control, JICPA has published the Auditing Standards Committee Report No.12 ''Quality Control of Audits'', etc., which also serve as auditing standards to be observed by audit corporations and CPAs. Further, for the quality control of audits, JICPA has been conducting quality control review since 1999. ''Quality control review'' is a system under which JICPA's full-time staff reviews the status, etc. of quality control of audits conducted by audit firms and recommends improvements to audit firms as necessary. Since April 2004, the Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board (CPAAOB) established in the Financial Services Agency (FSA) has been screening ''quality control review'' and conducting inspections targeted at JICPA, audit firms, etc. as necessary, for the purpose of further improving the ''quality control review'' functions and enhancing and reinforcing audit duties at audit firms. |
* | We deliver the hottest information of the times in this section, selected
from among questions and answers given at the Minister's press conferences etc. ''Hot Picks from the Financial World'' for this month feature an excerpt of finance-related statements made at the inaugural press conference by Mr. Kaoru Yosano, who assumed office as Minister of State for Financial Services and Economic and Fiscal Policy on October 31. For further information, please access the ''Press Conferences'' section of Financial Services Agency's official website. |
|
[Opening Statement at Inaugural Press Conference by Kaoru Yosano, New Minister of State for Financial Services and Economic and Fiscal Policy] |
||
As a result of the Cabinet reshuffle today, I have been appointed as
Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy and Financial Services. I am
committed to making the utmost efforts to fulfill the duties that have been
assigned to me. In regards to financial administration, the percentage of non-performing loans has fallen to less than 3% at major banks and to about 5% in other financial institutions, thanks to substantial efforts made by the parties concerned. As many people have had an extremely tough time in the process, the time has come for financial institutions to take on risks and resume their financial activities to bring about economic growth in Japan. As financial administration in itself is substantially authoritarian, I believe power should be exercised in a restrained manner and in the interests of the national economy, and for each and every citizen. Banks can now sell products of life and non-life insurance companies over the counter, and in the latest Diet session, the revision of the law on bank agencies was finally approved. In such an environment, a wide range of new kinds of investment business will emerge in the days ahead. I personally believe that certain laws will have to be amended in order to ensure that peoples' assets are safely invested. Further, there is the question of whether there are any inadequacies in the legislation regarding corporate acquisitions. Various empirical and academic studies are being conducted, so we need to look into whether legislative amendments are required. |
|
A. |
The primary mission or business of a financial institution is to take risks. Without risk-taking, the financial sector cannot stimulate the economy. My approach is always based on the assumption that the Japanese financial system is extremely well-developed. Indeed, there are problems such as those relating to over-banking, but they will naturally have to be solved. This may not be a pressing issue for the Japanese financial system, but I imagine the biggest challenge that the system will have to face is how the postal bank will enter the financial system. |
|
A. |
I think this problem has largely been sorted out over the past decade. It has been sorted out through mergers and closure of branches, and a considerable number of branches have been shut by managerial decision. Yet, the number of financial institutions remains higher than in other countries. The question is whether it is fair to simply compare it with other countries. It depends on Japan's economic culture, business relationships stemming from the past and various other factors. Nevertheless, I think we must look at the fundamentals of the economy to see whether it can sustain so many financial institutions. |
|
A. |
It will probably come down to the number of financial institutions that is appropriate for the size of the Japanese economy, but this should be subject to the situation at each financial institution. It is not a matter for the FSA to dictate that individual institutions go out of business or scale down. |
|
A. |
Financial administration requires transparency, and inspections need to be conducted properly in order to protect peoples' financial assets. I am not particularly worried about financial institutions in general, but for financial administration in the broad sense, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) must constantly be on the lookout, to determine ways to prevent innocent consumers being caught up in bad situations due to new financial products and to determine whether securities transactions are performed in a fair and transparent manner. In addition, financial institutions must have a proper vision or screening system that enables them to take risks as mentioned previously, although this is at their managerial discretion. Further, in the reform of government-affiliated financial institutions, I am concerned about what may happen to the financing framework for small and micro enterprises in the future. As politicians, we should be concerned about this in the context of social policy, separate from the so-called market mechanism. |
|
(from the inaugural press conference on Monday, October 31, 2005) |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Crimes involving withdrawal of deposits/savings at automatic teller machines (ATMs) with stolen and counterfeit cash cards are increasing. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
1. Management of Personal Identification Number (PIN) | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
2. Management of Cash Card | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
(Reference: Security Measures at Home) | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
3. Account Management | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
If you realize your cash card is missing... |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
In recent years, there have been incidents involving unauthorized transfers executed by using personal information, etc. stolen based on a fraud technique known as ''phishing'' and programs referred to as ''spyware''. As the methods used are extremely elaborate, there is no way of preventing damage from occurring and spreading unless the Internet user proactively takes countermeasures. Internet users are advised to take proper measures by using the information here as reference. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
2. Be Suspicious of E-mail First. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
3. Stay Clear of Suspicious Websites. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
4. Do NOT Use Suspicious CD-ROMs, etc. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
What is Phishing? | ||||||||||||||||
''Phishing'' is a scam involving e-mail sent by a criminal who impersonates a financial institution (bank or credit card company), etc. (such e-mail is hereinafter referred to as ''phishing e-mail,'' refer to below) which is designed to defraud users of their personal information, such as address, name, bank account number and credit card number. A typical tactic is to dupe a user into visiting a bogus website via a hyperlink on the e-mail and enter his/her personal information on that website. This might result in unauthorized withdrawals from the user's account or unauthorized use of his/her credit cards. In the United States, which already suffered from huge damage in this area, approx. 73 million people have received more than 50 phishing e-mails per year on average, and the related financial damage has reached approx. $930 million (approx. \100 billion) according to a survey conducted by U.S. research firm Gartner Inc. Incidents involving thefts of ID and passwords for Internet banking and credit card numbers have already occurred in Japan, and there are concerns that the damage might spread in the years to come. | ||||||||||||||||
[Example of Phishing E-mail] |
||||||||||||||||
Phishing e-mails may be designed to: dupe users into visiting a website that is an imitation of a service provider's website as in case (1) below; or direct users to a genuine website and then urge them to change the password as in case (2) below. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
* At first glance, it looks like a hyperlink to the website of ~ Service but if you click on it, the browser displays a bogus website imitating ~ Service's website. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
* In this case, if you click on the hyperlink, ~ Service's genuine website
will be displayed. If you change the password to ''******'' as instructed in the
e-mail, your password will be ''known to third parties.'' |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Dear Customer of ~ Service, Due to enhanced security measures at ~ Service, customers are required to confirm their identity online. Failure to perform this step may cause operational problems online. Please take this step as soon as possible. https://www.~.co.jp/login/index.htm Dear Customer of ~ Service, Due to enhanced security measures at ~ Service, customers are required to change their password. Your new password is ******. Please click on the following link to change the password. https://www.~.co.jp/login/passchange.htm Failure to perform this step may cause problems in using ~ Service securely. Please take this step as soon as possible. |
||||||||||||||||
What is Spyware? |
||||||||||||||||
There have already been incidents in Japan involving so-called ''spyware''
that is aimed at stealing ID and passwords for Internet banking. There are
concerns that the damage might spread in the years to come. A typical tactic is
to install a certain program in the user's computer, and thereby steal the
user's ID and password for various services including card numbers and other
such information. This information is used for unauthorized withdrawals from the
user's account, unauthorized use of his/her credit cards, etc. Such spyware programs can be installed in the user's computer when the user browses a suspicious website, reads a suspicious e-mail, or installs a program from an unknown source. |
||||||||||||||||
[Example of Triggers of Spyware Installation] |
||||||||||||||||
Spyware installation is typically triggered either by: browsing a website as in case (1); reading an e-mail as in case (2); or running a file downloaded from the Internet as in case (3). | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Financial Services Agency Home page >> FSA Newsletter >> November 2005 |