(Note 1) |
|
SME Financing Monitoring is not a fixed-point survey in which the survey is conducted with the same interviewees every time. |
(Note 2) |
|
The table above shows the breakdown of valid responses and does NOT include non-responses and unclear responses. For this reason, the number of interviewees is not consistent with the total number of responses. |
- Reasons given by respondents who selected "4. Turned somewhat more negative" or "5. Turned negative" in the table above |
Reasons given for Answer 4 or 5 above |
Major Banks |
Regional Banks,
Second-tier Regional Banks |
Shinkin Banks, Credit Unions |
Government- affiliated Financial Institutions |
Total |
Refusal of new loan requests |
1 |
4.8% |
7 |
17.9% |
8 |
30.8% |
8 |
19.5% |
24 |
18.9% |
Collateral & guarantee |
3 |
14.3% |
14 |
35.9% |
8 |
30.8% |
5 |
12.2% |
30 |
23.6% |
Interest rates |
1 |
4.8% |
3 |
7.7% |
2 |
7.7% |
1 |
2.4% |
7 |
5.5% |
Lending terms |
5 |
23.8% |
9 |
23.1% |
5 |
19.2% |
14 |
34.1% |
33 |
26.0% |
Loan assessment procedures |
5 |
23.8% |
5 |
12.8% |
3 |
11.5% |
10 |
24.4% |
23 |
18.1% |
Other |
6 |
28.6% |
1 |
2.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
3 |
7.3% |
10 |
7.9% |
Total |
21 |
100.0% |
39 |
100.0% |
26 |
100.0% |
41 |
100.0% |
127 |
100.0% |
|
(Note) |
|
As a single interviewee may give multiple answers, the total number of answers 4 and 5 above (98) is not consistent with the total number of the responses in the table above (127). |
|
(2) Overview of interview results: "Actual status, etc. of SME financing in the respective regions from the viewpoint of SMEs" |
> Interviews were conducted on the following eight topics regarding the actual status, etc. of SME financing in the respective regions from the viewpoint of SMEs: |
(a) Stance to lending
(b) Collateral and guarantee (c) Management guidance and business startup or revival assistance (d) System of providing explanation when lending (e) Quality and ability of financial institutions (f) Period of loan assessment (g) Interest rates (h) Others |
|
> Main comments received with respect to each topic are as follows: |
(a) Comments on actual status of stance to lending |
|
- |
|
There have been no reports on credit crunch and oppressive debt collection. Financial institutions are generally inclined to actively tap new borrowers. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Staff of financial institutions come to places of business for solicitation and respond promptly to changes in lending terms. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Can acknowledge the branch manager's positive stance from regular visits to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, etc. to collect information on regional affairs and request mediation for financing, etc. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions' stance to lending varies and is becoming polarized due to their cherry-picking of borrowing companies. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Kinki, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
|
(b) Comments on actual status of collateral and guarantee |
|
- |
|
It is becoming easier to borrow partly due to the commercialization of affiliated loans targeted at JCCI members, etc. which do not require any collateral/third-party guarantee. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are providing loans without relying on collateral and guarantees after properly assessing the business performance of the company itself. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Kinki, Chugoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Additional collateral is no longer requested upon refinancing. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Tokai, Kinki and Shikoku) |
- |
|
The valuation of collateral is reasonable and financial institutions are lending actively. (Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku and Shikoku) |
- |
|
Financial institutions do not rely on collateral and guarantees as excessively as they used to. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Tokai, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions might be focusing on collateral and guarantees because considerable skill is required for non-collateral valuations. (Tokai and Kyushu) |
- |
|
Financial institutions' stance to lending still appears to be dependent on collateral and guarantees. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are shifting their focus from physical collateral to human resources collateral. (Tohoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka.) |
|
(c) Comments on actual status of management guidance and business startup or revival assistance |
|
- |
|
Financial institutions are making efforts aggressively at the organization level, such as establishing management consulting divisions. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Kinki, Chugoku and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are appointing experts and making efforts in human resources development. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Chugoku and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are preparing aggressive revival plans by digging deep into management affairs. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Kinki, Chugoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are actively providing consulting and business-matching services while training SME management consultants. (Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are making aggressive efforts in holding management seminars, collaborating with SME Revitalization Support Councils and investing in funds. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are making progress in joint industry-academic-government initiatives. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Hokuriku and Shikoku) |
- |
|
Financial institutions do not have the structure to venture into management guidance and business startup/revival assistance. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are not actively engaged in management guidance and business startup/revival assistance. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu) |
|
(d) Comments on system of providing explanation when lending |
|
- |
|
The explanations provided by financial institutions seem sufficient, as there are opportunities for the company, financial institution, and the Society of Commerce and Industry, etc. to have tripartite meetings. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are providing sufficient explanation upon financing with respect to the purpose of funds, cash flows, cash planning, borrowing limit, etc. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial institutions appear to be improving their system of providing an explanation at the organization level. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are making sure that a careful explanation is provided even in cases where a request for a loan is rejected. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku, Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu) |
- |
|
Explanation of risks and matters that are disadvantageous to financial institutions is insufficient. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions lack the ability to provide an explanation, including the staff's lack of knowledge. (Kanto, Kinki, Chugoku, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Explanation is insufficient in cases where a loan request is rejected. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu) |
|
(e) Comments on actual status of quality and ability of financial institutions |
|
- |
|
Financial institutions are making aggressive efforts at the organization level, including encouraging staff to acquire qualifications. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Shikoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are actively conducting training to improve their discerning eyes, and are gaining the ability to determine the future potential of companies. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku, Chugoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
The qualities and abilities of financial institutions are sufficient in terms of analysis of financial statements, analysis of cash flows, etc. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are not making enough efforts to improve the qualities and abilities of staff at the organization level. (Hokkaido, Kanto, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
Financial institutions are attaching importance to past performance, while ignoring the qualities of the top management and the future potential of companies. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
|
(f) Comments on period of loan assessment |
|
- |
|
The assessment period is becoming shorter. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Financial instruments with shorter assessment periods are being developed, as exemplified by "speedy loans". (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Kinki, Shikoku, Kyushu and Fukuoka) |
- |
|
The assessment process is becoming simpler—for example, less documentation is required for application. (Kanto, Hokuriku, Kinki and Shikoku) |
- |
|
The assessment period is still long for some loans. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Kinki, Chugoku, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
The assessment period is becoming shorter (some as short as two to three business days) based on the utilization of SME credit risk database (CRD), unique scoring sheets, etc. However, the assessment period is long (approx. one month) for some publicly-backed loans. (Kanto, Kinki and Chugoku) |
|
(g) Comments on actual status of interest rates |
|
- |
|
There have been no particular complaints about interest rates. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Interest rates are on the decline. In some cases, financial institutions offer lower interest rates due to competition with other banks. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku and Okinawa) |
- |
|
Interest rates are being set properly according to the credit risks. (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu) |
- |
|
There have been no reports lately about financial institutions demanding that interest rates be raised one-sidedly. (Shikoku) |
- |
|
While financial institutions have the right to decide interest rates, negotiations with the loan applicant are inadequate in some cases. (Kanto and Kinki) |
- |
|
In some cases, high interest rates are offered even to applicants with a good financial position unless they negotiate with financial institutions. (Tohoku, Kanto, Tokai, Hokuriku, Kinki, Chugoku, Kyushu, Fukuoka, Okinawa) |
|
|
- |
|
JCCI and other commerce/industry-related groups should be provided with information on all monetary policies, not just on SME financing. (Tohoku) |
- |
|
While it goes without saying that financial institutions should be supervised properly, "debt" still tends to be considered a taboo in Japan, resulting in the lack of proper education both at home and at school. Deregulation seems to have taken precedence in that users appear to be at the mercy of service providers due to having virtually no knowledge. For this reason, users should be educated properly on matters that they should at least be aware of. (Kanto) |
- |
|
In some cases, companies apply for loans without making business efforts, as a wide range of publicly-backed loans are available. In a way, it hinders the growth of young entrepreneurs. (Hokuriku) |
- |
|
There are cases in which the loan applicant agrees to everything the financial institution says in negotiations over the discount rate of bills and the lending rate. Part of the problem is the lack of learning efforts on the borrower's side. (Kinki) |
- |
|
A system that enables businesses to revive even after failing once (bankruptcy, etc.) should be established. Direct financing should also be realized in rural districts. Otherwise, it would be difficult to start new businesses and revive existing businesses. (Kyushu) |
|
(3) Overview of interview results: "Case examples showing the penetration of measures for facilitating SME financing" |
- |
|
In SME Financing Monitoring, a specific theme relating to inspection and supervision is set each time, and a survey is conducted accordingly with respect to cases showing the penetration of measures for facilitating SME financing. |
- |
|
The theme for the latest Monitoring was as follows. |
|
Degree of SMEs' awareness of the Supplementary Issue to the Financial Inspection |
|
[Main Comments Received] |
- |
|
Although the Supplementary Issue to the Financial Inspection Manual seems to have penetrated enough related institutions, it does not appear to have penetrated borrowers (SMEs). |
- |
|
Now that financial institutions' lending stance is positive, the Supplementary Issue might not be as necessary as before. |
- |
|
Public sentiment has improved since the production of the Supplementary Issue. The Supplementary Issue is hardly discussed nowadays. |
- |
|
Why not utilize PR campaigns using the Internet, TV commercials and other media? |
|
3. How the "SME Financing Monitoring" Results Are Utilized |
(1) |
|
Interviews |
|
|
We conducted interviews with individual financial institutions in regards to their action policies, systems, etc. by making effective use of the information on those financial institutions obtained from SME Financing Monitoring. |
(2) |
|
Requests at Discussion Meetings (Utilized by FSA) |
|
|
We present cases acquired from SME Financing Monitoring at monthly discussion meetings held between top officials of the FSA and representatives of business associations and on other occasions. More specifically, we request participants to: further facilitate the supply of funds to sound SMEs, including loans focusing on cash flows from business activities without excessively relying on collateral and guarantees; provide a sufficient explanation that could gain customers' understanding and convince them, in consideration of the past business relationship and the customers' knowledge, experience and asset positions; make the Supplementary Issue to the Financial Inspection Manual common knowledge; and so on. |
(3) |
|
Utilization at Conference for Regional Financing Facilitation (Utilized by Local Finance Bureaus, etc.) |
|
|
On various occasions including the semiannual Conference for Regional Financing Facilitation in each prefecture (consisting of financial authorities, small- and medium-sized and regional financial institutions and relevant business associations) and meetings between top officials of Local Finance Bureaus and representatives of financial institutions, we urge participants to develop a system to provide an explanation to customers and enhance consultation and complaint-handling functions, and request them to make efforts to facilitate SME financing. |
|