- On 18 January 2006, the EU-Japan High Level Meeting on Financial Issues was held at the headquarters of the European Commission in Brussels, the capital of Belgium. The meeting is a regular international conference, which has been held once a year since 1985, in order for senior administrative officials of the fiscal and monetary authorities of Japan and the European Union (EU)--namely, the Japanese Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the Financial Services Agency (FSA) and the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN) and the Directorate General for Internal Market and Services (DG MARKT) of the European Commission--to exchange opinions on the macroeconomic climate and major issues relating to the respective financial sectors in Japan and the EU. This meeting was attended by Mr. Hiroshi Watanabe, Vice-Minister of Finance for International Affairs, MOF, Mr. Toru Shikibu, Deputy Commissioner for International Affairs, FSA and their related staff, and by Mr. Klaus Regling, Director General of DG ECFIN, Mr. Alexander Schaub, Director General of DG MARKT and their related staff.
- In this meeting, the morning session started with discussions between MOF and DG ECFIN on the macroeconomic climate and fiscal and monetary policies in Japan and the EU. This was followed by a joint session with the participation of MOF, FSA, DG ECFIN and DG MARKT which involved discussions on the influence of China's economic performance on the Japanese and EU economies, the stability of the Chinese financial sector, and EU's assessment on the equivalence of the Japanese accounting standard with the International Accounting Standard (IAS). In the afternoon session, FSA and DG MARKT exchanged opinions on the developments in Japan and EU's financial sectors in recent years. The Meeting was productive in that opinions were actively exchanged throughout the day between MOF, FSA and the European Commission. The following is a summary of discussions on FSA-related matters.
- With respect to the assessment on equivalence between accounting standards, in January 2005, as part of measures to consolidate the EU capital markets, the European Commission introduced a new rule that obliges local companies whose securities are listed on stock exchanges within the EU region to disclose IAS-compliant financial statements. Furthermore, the European Commission is going to apply the rule that obliges non-EU companies listed on the stock exchanges within EU region to disclose financial statements which comply with IAS or other accounting standards equivalent to IAS. Accordingly, with the aim of applying such obligations to foreign companies from January 2007 onwards, the European Commission has been assessing Japanese, American and Canadian accounting standards as to whether they are equivalent to IAS, and has been working toward reaching its conclusion. If in the end the European Commission concludes that the Japanese accounting standard is not equivalent to IAS, Japanese companies, which are currently listed on stock exchanges within EU region, will not be allowed to disclose information to EU investors by publishing financial statements based on the Japanese accounting standard; they will have to disclose information based on IAS or other accounting standards equivalent to IAS, which will be a significant burden on them.
In this context, the FSA has stressed that Japanese accounting standard should be deemed equivalent to IAS because the Japanese accounting standard is already consistent with IAS and has excellent quality through the experience of ''the Accounting Big Bang'' in the late 1990s. In this meeting, Mr. Watanabe stated his concern that EU's uncertain direction to the conclusion of the assessment is increasing uncertainty of future funding of Japanese companies in the EU capital market.
In response, the European Commission underlined the importance of ensuring effective equivalence between accounting standards through their convergence, and expressed its view that this problem could surely be resolved in the future by maintaining a close relationship between Japan and EU.
Both Japan and EU share a consensus that it was important that the Accounting Standard Board of Japan (ASBJ), which established the Japanese accounting standard, and the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB), which established IAS, have to make progress on collaborative activities towards convergence of the Japanese accounting standard and IAS, including their ongoing joint project.
- With respect to developments of the Japanese financial sector, the FSA explained that the non-performing loans problem of major banks--which had been a crucial issue--was resolved and international confidence in the Japanese financial system has been restored and introduced various measures for responding to the diversification of financial services and consumer needs and the recent further globalization of the financial sector, according to the Program for Further Financial Reform. The European Commission praised the rapid progress of Japanese financial system reform. As the European Commission showed its interest in how the review of the bank agent system would have an influence on the business of foreign financial institutions operating in Japan, the FSA explained the merits of the reform for both consumers and financial institutions.
The FSA also introduced the basic concept of the draft of the Investment Services Law (provisional name) and the efforts for its legislation. Based on its experience of efforts to consolidate the EU financial markets, the European Commission asked questions about reflecting the opinions of market players in the legislative process. In response, the FSA explained that it had been working towards its legislation by taking account of the opinions of market players in foreign countries, including the EU, as well as those in Japan. The European Commission praised the FSA's efforts to create a new legal framework, which regulates various types of businesses and services in the Japanese financial sector in a cross-sectoral, comprehensive manner, because of being consistent with the trend of financial liberalization and globalization.
- On the other hand, in regards to development in the EU financial sector, the European Commission introduced the White Paper on Financial Services Policy, which was announced at the end of last year as a comprehensive plan for consolidation of financial markets within the EU region in the next five years, and the priority issues to be tackled in the future based on this plan. The European Commission announced the White Paper--a plan to further consolidate the financial markets within the EU region --following the previous comprehensive policy program, the Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP). The FSA and the European Commission actively discussed the influence of the Clearing and Settlement Services Directive, which aims at unifying the clearing and settlement systems within EU borders, upon financial markets outside the EU region, in light of the provision of the White Paper, which requires the European Commission to take account of the influence of various future measures upon third countries.
Moreover, the European Commission presented the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), which is aimed at consolidating the EU capital markets (such as entry restriction on investment service businesses (the passport system), investor protection rules, promotion of competition among market participants) and future activity to execute MiFID. The FSA and the European Commission exchanged opinions on the obligations imposed on investment service providers by comparing the Japanese system with the EU system.
- After the meeting, the joint press release, outlining the meeting, was published.
The next EU-Japan High Level Meeting on Financial Issues is scheduled to take place in Tokyo. (The date is yet to be decided.)
|