2004.9.16 (provisional translation)
Financial Services Agency

The Gap between Major Banks' Self-Assessment and the Result of FSA's Inspections

The Financial Services Agency (and the Financial Supervisory Agency, predecessor to the Financial Services Agency before June 2000) has been implementing inspections based on inspection manual since 2000, and is now running the fourth round of such inspections for major banks. Following tables show the amount of classified loans and the sum of write-offs and provisions (loan loss reserves) on an aggregated basis, resulting from four rounds of inspections.

1. Ratio of the gap for the amount of classified loans (billion yen, %)
  Number of
inspected
banks
Self-
assessment
(a)
FSA's
inspection
(b)
Gap

(c)=(b)-(a)
Ratio of the gap to
self-assessment (c)/(a) and its
distribution
  And
above
50%
25~50

%
Below

25%
 1st round 15 34,611.1 47,019.7 12,408.6 35.9 5 7   3
 2nd round 12 39,715.9 43,727.9   4,012.0 10.1 0 2 10
 3rd round 11 34,554.3 36,467.5  1,913.2  5.5 0 1 10
 4th round   4   8,340.7   8,829.9     489.2   5.9 -
2. Ratio of the gap for the sum of write-offs and provisions (billion yen, %)
  Number of
inspected
banks
Self-
assessment
(a)
FSA's
inspection
(b)
Gap

(c)=(b)-(a)
Ratio of the gap to
self-assessment (c)/(a) and its
distribution
  And
above
50%
25~50

%
Below

25%
 1st round 15 10,394.7 15,287.0 4,892.3 47.1 5 6   4
 2nd round 12 12,876.9 14,709.6 1,832.7 14.2 2 0 10
 3rd round 11 10,300.0 11,728.7 1,428.7 13.9 0 2 9
 4th round   4   3,261.0   3,496.6    235.6   7.2 -

note)

  1. Each round of inspections comprises an inspection per major bank, which checked figures as of one of the several business terms shown below :
  • The first round : either end-March 2000, end-September 2000, end-March 2001, or end-September 2001.
  • The second round : either end-September 2001, end-March 2002, end-September 2002, or end-March 2003.
  • The third round : either end-September 2002, end-March 2003, end-September 2003, or end-March 2004.
  • The fourth round : either end-September 2003 or end-March 2004.
  1. The amount of classified loans indicates the sum of loan assets classified under category II (assets deemed to bear a higher-than-normal repayment risk), category III (assets with serious doubts about collection or value), and category IV (assets deemed to be uncollectible or without value). The sum of write-offs and provisions indicates the sum of direct write-offs which took place during the business term of inspection and the amount of provisions for loan losses at the end of the term, both calculated on the basis of total credit.
  2. The third round of inspections covered four out of 11 major banks at the time of announcement last September. Following tables show the comparison between the figures aggregated for all 11 major banks and those announced last year for 4 banks.
(1) Ratio of the gap for the amount of classified loans (billion yen, %)
  Self-assessment

(a)
FSA’s inspection

(b)
Gap

(c)=(b)-(a)
Ratio of the gap to
self-assessment
(c) / (a)
Announced last
year (4 banks)
  9,344.3   9,902.9   558.6 6.0
All 11 major
banks
34,554.3 36,467.5 1,913.2 5.5
(2) Ratio of the gap for the sum of write-offs and provisions (billion yen, %)
  Self-assessment

(a)
FSA’s inspection

(b)
Gap

(c)=(b)-(a)
Ratio of the gap to
self-assessment
(c) / (a)
Announced last
year (4 banks)
  2,349.7   2,553.3    203.6   8.7
All 11 major
banks
10,300.0 11,728.7 1,428.7 13.9

Site Map

top of page