SESC Latest Topics No.22«March 2016»
Last Updated : March 28, 2016
SESC Latest Topics No.22«March 2016» | Last Updated : March 28, 2016 |
What’s New on the SESC Website
(Month of March 2016)
This page contains the latest in events, developments, and updates to the SESC website.
Topics
“Financial Instruments Business Operators under on-site inspection by the SESC”Available in Japanese
Press Releases
(Following press release is available in Japanese)
Financial Instruments Businesses etc.
March 18, 2016: | Recommendation for an administrative action against Premiere Securities Co., Ltd. «Summary» The SESC recommended that the Prime Minister and the Commissioner of the FSA take an administrative action against Premiere Securities Co., Ltd. (“the Company”), a Type I and II Financial Instruments Business Operator. Based on an inspection of the Company, the SESC identified that it had serious problems concerning investor protection, such as investments in a number of funds managed by Specially Permitted Business Notifying Persons that were not certified as such by a Qualified Institutional Investor. |
---|---|
March 18, 2016: | Recommendation for an administrative action against TOGAKU Securities Co., Ltd. «Summary» The SESC recommended that the Prime Minister and the Commissioner of the FSA take an administrative action against TOGAKU Securities Co., Ltd. (“the Company”), a Type I and II Financial Instruments Business Operator and an Investment Advisor/Agency. Based on an inspection of the Company, the SESC identified that the situation is a case where such action is acknowledged to be “necessary and appropriate for the public interest or the protection of investors with regard to a Financial Instruments Business Operator’s business operations”, as stipulated under Article 51 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. |
March 18, 2016: | Notification of Inspection Results to One Plus One Co., Ltd. «Summary» The SESC announced the results of an inspection of One Plus One Co., Ltd. (“the Company”), a Specially Permitted Business Notifying Person. Based on an inspection of the Company, the SESC identified that it has problems concerning investments in funds managed by Specially Permitted Business Notifying Persons, has been actively party to misconducts by disguising the appearance of funds as if they had been invested by a Qualified Institutional Investor, and has managed funds in a sloppy manner. |
March 15, 2016: | Recommendation for administrative action against First Make Limited Co., Ltd. «Summary» The SESC recommended that the Prime Minister and the Commissioner of the FSA take administrative action against First Make Limited Co., Ltd. (“the Company”), an Investment Advisor/Agency, a Financial instruments intermediary and a Specially Permitted Business Notifying Person. Based on an inspection of the Company, the SESC identified that it has solicited customers by utilizing corporate information, has insufficiently managed corporate information and has been party to the submission of false financial statements by the listed company. |
March 11, 2016: | Recommendation for an administrative action against Global Report Co., Ltd. «Summary» The SESC recommended that the Prime Minister and the Commissioner of the FSA take administrative action against Global Report Co., Ltd. (“the Company”), an Investment Advisor/Agency. Based on an inspection of the Company, the SESC identified that it was not adequately staffed to properly conduct financial instruments business. |
March 11, 2016: | Petition for court injunction against F Support Co., Ltd., and its manager. «Summary» The SESC filed a petition with the Tokyo District Court for injunction against F Support Co., Ltd., (“the Company”) and its substantive manager to prohibit and suspend them from conducting the following activities. Based on the investigation of the Company, the SESC identified that it engaged in brokering for sales and purchase of listed stocks and trading initial public offerings to customers without statutory registration. |
Market Misconduct